WSU coach’s status unclear facing vax deadline

NCAAF

PULLMAN, Wash. — Washington State coach Nick Rolovich said he has not been updated on the status of his religious exemption request needed to become compliant with the state’s COVID-19 vaccination mandate.

Without a resolution, it raises the possibility Rolovich will not be allowed to continue in his job past Monday’s state deadline to either be vaccinated or have an approved exemption.

“I’m gonna come to work tomorrow … I don’t think this is in my hands,” Rolovich said. “So I’ve been settled for a long time on it and I just believe it’s going to work out the right way.”

His comments came moments after the Cougars (4-3) beat Stanford, 34-31, running their winning streak to three games and prompting players to dump a bucket of Gatorade over his head near midfield.

When the state of Washington expanded its vaccine mandate to include all employees at higher learning institutions in August, Rolovich said he would comply, but has since confirmed he applied for a religious exemption to avoid becoming vaccinated. He has been asked repeatedly for weeks to expand upon the reasoning for his position but has declined to provide clarity.

“[It’s been] about three months, four months,” Rolovich said. “So I’ve gotten used to it. These kids are incredible. Love being around them. They’re playing their hearts out for for this university. I think they’ve got a real good bond that they’ll remember for the rest of their life. And it’s just pretty special.”

Ahead of Monday’s deadline, there remain a number of ways Rolovich’s situation could unfold.

Before anything can happen, the WSU committee assigned to examining all of the religious exemption requests needs to evaluate the one from Rolovich. It’s a blind process, meaning the committee will not have access to any identifying information while making its determination, a process designed to treat every employee equally. At least two people trained in the legality of the religious exemption have to review every application and it is not guaranteed they will get to Rolovich’s by Monday, according to WSU spokesperson Phil Weiler.

Employees who did not get their final shot by October 4 — the last day to allow for the requisite time to become fully vaccinated by the deadline — or were slow to file the exemption request risked not having it processed in time, Weiler said.

“We messaged really clearly for quite a long time prior to that October 4 deadline that if you wanted to receive an exemption, you would need to submit it as early as possible to ensure that a decision could be rendered prior to that October 19 date,” Weiler said on Wednesday. “If we get a rush of requests at the end and the committee isn’t able to work through all of them in time, the employee is not going to be able to work for the university until that decision on the request is rendered.”

If Rolovich’s request is not processed by Monday, he would either be placed on leave or can take accrued vacation until there is a resolution. He has not said when he filed the exemption.

Rolovich would also have the option to appeal the committee’s decision if his request is denied. That process does not have a defined timeline.

If the committee denies Rolovich’s request and he remains unwilling to get vaccinated, his employment would be terminated immediately. At that point, it’s expected the school would refuse to pay out the rest of his contract — setting up a possible legal battle.

Rolovich’s annual salary is roughly $3 million, of which $2 million is considered a base salary. If he were to be terminated without cause, the terms of his contract would require the university pay him 60% of his remaining base salary through June 30, 2025.

It is unclear what would happen if Rolovich’s request is denied, he reverses his stance and becomes willing to get vaccinated. However, the mandate would prevent him from doing his job for at least 14 days, the minimum time to become fully vaccinated with the Johnson & Johnson shot.

Should his request be granted, it does not guarantee he will remain WSU’s coach. In that scenario, the approval from the committee would be delivered to the university’s human resources department, which would inform his supervisor, athletic director Pat Chun.

“The supervisor needs to determine: can this person really complete their responsibilities, their job duties, and do it in a way that is protecting the public?” Weiler said. “And then the supervisor then makes a decision. Either they say ‘yes,’ then the exemption is granted. If they say ‘no,’ the exemption is denied.”

In the case of Rolovich, who is the state’s highest paid employee, the decision on whether accommodations could be made would involve other university leadership, including president Kirk Schulz.

“In general, statutes including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Washington Law Against Discrimination require that employers reasonably accommodate their employees’ sincere religious beliefs, as long as the accommodation does not impose an undue burden on the employer,” Charlotte Garden, an associate law professor at the Seattle University School of Law and an expert in labor and employment law, said in an email. “A typical [non-pandemic-related] accommodation might involve an employer partially waiving its rules on employee dress to allow an employee to wear a religiously mandated head covering, or an employer allowing an employee to take breaks at certain times in order to pray.

“Applying this standard in the context of the covid vaccine mandate is considerably more complicated.”

It is possible WSU leadership has already received the committee’s decision and has decided on a course of action but has yet to inform Rolovich. Neither Chun nor Schultz have provided a clear indication if the university will be willing, or able, to accommodate Rolovich if his exemption is approved.

Rolovich said he has not been given any indication from Chun how the process will play out if his request is granted.

“If that’s not what [Chun] wants, then I guess that then I gotta, I gotta move on,” Rolovich said. “But I like being here. I like being the coach here. I love these kids. And I just got faith in it.”

Further complicating an already unprecedented situation is that there are multiple coaches on Rolovich’s staff who are also not vaccinated, according to multiple sources, and face the same exemption process as their head coach. The total number has not been made public.

If Rolovich is granted an exemption and university leadership determines he can fulfill his responsibilities while meeting the public safety obligation, he will remain the team’s coach, provided he continues to follow the masking and other safety protocols.

WSU has not provided any examples of what qualifies as a religious exemption. As part of the application process, Rolovich would have needed to attest to how his “sincerely held religious belief” is in conflict with the vaccine requirement.

No major religious denomination opposes vaccines for COVID-19 but that has no bearing on what can be considered a sincerely held belief.

Rolovich was made available via Zoom after Saturday’s game and is scheduled to speak to the media on Monday.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

ACC-leading SMU signs Lashlee to extension
MVP calls claims Paul-Tyson was rigged ‘illogical’
Sources: Cubs trade for Morgan, DFA Wisdom
After defeating Mike Tyson, everybody wants a piece of Jake Paul
No. 21 Creighton PG Ashworth doubtful vs. SDSU

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *