MLBPA sues DraftKings, FanDuel over NIL use

MLB

Major League Baseball’s players union sued DraftKings and FanDuel on Monday, accusing the sports betting companies and two others of using the names and likenesses of hundreds of players on their platforms without permission.

Players are seeking compensatory and punitive damages from DraftKings and Britain’s bet365 Group in Philadelphia federal court, and from FanDuel and Brooklyn-based Underdog Fantasy in a New York state court in Manhattan.

Calling online sports betting “big business,” MLB players accused the defendants of “flagrant” violations of state laws protecting the right of publicity, saying nearly every active player’s image appears on their websites and mobile apps.

“For professional athletes, the ability to control the commercial use of their names, images, and likenesses is a crucial return on their substantial career investment,” the players said.

Keeping such control also helps players avoid being perceived as supportive of companies and products they dislike, the players added.

DraftKings, FanDuel and Underdog did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Bet365 could not immediately be reached after business hours. The players’ lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for additional comment.

Monday’s lawsuits were filed three weeks after the National Football League players union, represented by the same law firm as the MLB players, sued DraftKings for refusing to pay for using NFL player likenesses on so-called non-fungible tokens.

In Monday’s complaints, the MLB players said the defendants don’t use NFL player likenesses on their platforms.

They said the only reason to treat baseball players differently was to increase “consumer appeal” and draw more bets, given that the “core information” that bettors need is statistical data, not what players look like.

Users, for example, could bet that the Philadelphia Phillies’ Bryce Harper or New York Mets’ Pete Alonso will hit more than two home runs in a given game, without seeing each player’s “valuable image,” the complaints said.

The cases are MLB Players Inc v DraftKings Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 24-04884; and MLB Players Inc v. Underdog Sports Inc et al, New York State Supreme Court, New York County.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

ECU CB Revel Jr. declares for NFL draft
Sources: Villanova expected to hire Roedl as AD
Ishbia expects Suns to give KD extension in ’25
Doc fined for criticizing call refs say they got wrong
LPGA to award $131M over 33 events in 2025

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *